Board of Trustees of the Policemen's Pension Fund v. Christy
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Marshall, Justice.
We granted certiorari in this case to review the holdings of the Court of Appeals, that the phrase “in line of duty” in the provision for in-line-of-duty disability pensions in the Act establishing the Policemen’s Pension Fund of Atlanta (Ga. L. 1933, p. 213; as amended) means the same as “arises out of and in the course of employment” under the Georgia Workers’ Compensation Act (Code § 114-102), and that the appellee-claimant’s injuries were in fact received “in line of duty,” as that phrase had been construed.
1. We agree with the Court of Appeals’ construction of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gazan v. HeerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Thompson v. Eastern Air Lines Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Williams v. Bear's Den, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- City of MacOn v. HerringtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. BolenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Johnson v. RETIREMENT BD. OF POLICEMEN'S ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUNDIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Fleming v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- Maciejewski v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Bible v. BibleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- Tuten v. City of BrunswickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.