Legal Opinion

Paul B. Emerick Co. v. Wm. Bohnenkamp & Associates, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1965PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

Plaintiff initiated this case to obtain a declaration that a mortgage given to it by defendant Wm. Bohnenkamp and Associates, Inc., was valid. The latter will be referred to as Bohnenkamp. Defendants Bohnenkamp and Laris on, who was trustee in bankruptcy for Bohnenkamp, filed a cross-complaint alleging that plaintiff was indebted to the trustee. During the trial the court ruled the mortgage invalid. Thereafter the trial proceeded on the allegations of the cross-complaint. As a part of the evidence in that part of the trial the court permitted plaintiff to introduce evidence in the nature of a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Standard Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Ross v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Derby v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. L. B. Menefee Lumber Co. v. MacDonaldOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Parker v. FaustOregon Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Bel Marin Driwall, Inc., Bert O. Summers, Doing Business as Erbentraut & Summers v. William B. Grover, Trustee in BankruptcyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  2. Korlann v. E-Z Pay Plan, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Kirby v. SnowOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Brown v. Portland School District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Brown v. Portland School District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API