Legal Opinion

Boeing Co. v. Gelman

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 12, 2000No. 25974-5-IIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHoughton, J.

— When two of the three members of the Board of Tax Appeals hear an appeal, the administrative rules generally require them to prepare an initial decision. Upon objection, the full Board reconsiders the appeal and issues a final decision. Two members heard Boeing’s appeal but issued a final decision without the input of a later appointed third member. The superior court found this *865failing violated the administrative rules; we agree and affirm, but remand to amend its order.

I. FACTS

In 1996, the Pierce County Assessor-Treasurer assessed the value of The Boeing Company’s Frederickson property…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Wilson Court v. Tony Maroni'sWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Walker v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Srcc v. Public Disclosure Com'nWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Wichert v. CardwellWashington Supreme Court · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eric Johnson, Apps/cross-resp v. Wa State Conservation Comm., Resps/cross-appCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API