Legal Opinion

Van Reimsdyk v. Kane

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island

Decided November 15, 1812PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The plaintiff is an inhabitant of Batavia in the island of Java, and the bill is brought to recover against [Oliver Kane and another] the executors of [John Innes] Clarke the amount of a bill of exchange drawn in behalf of the owners of the ship Patterson, by . Benjamin Monroe, their agent at Batavia, on a mercantile house in Amsterdam for 21,-488 guilders.

Read the full summary

The plaintiff is an inhabitant of Batavia in the island of Java, and the bill is brought to recover against [Oliver Kane and another] the executors of [John Innes] Clarke the amount of a bill of exchange drawn in behalf of the owners of the ship Patterson, by . Benjamin Monroe, their agent at Batavia, on a mercantile house in Amsterdam for 21,-488 guilders. The bill of exchange was dated 3 Nov., 1806) payable at nine months sight, was presented and protested for non-acceptance, 30 December, 1807, and was presented and protested for non-payment, 4 Oct., ISOS. The bill charged in substance,…

1Opinion of the Court

STORY. Circuit Justice.

The first question seems to be, whether the discharge of the firm of Monroe, Snow & Monroe under the insolvent act of Rhode Island is a complece discharge of them from this debt. The language of the insolvent act itself (1756) is, that a discharge under it shall be a perfect discharge “of and from all debts, duties, co i-traets, and demands, of every nature and kind whatsoever, that shall be at that time outstanding against the debtor, debts due to the crown itself only excepted.” And section 6 provides, that every creditor who shall not prove his debt before the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ruggles v. KeelerNew York Supreme Court · 1808
  2. Pearsall v. DwightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1806
  3. Smith v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1807
  4. Baker v. WheatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  5. Van Raugh v. Van ArsdalnNew York Supreme Court · 1805

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pearsall v. DwightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1806
  2. Andrews v. HerriotNew York Supreme Court · 1825
  3. Emery v. BurbankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  4. M'Menomy v. MurrayNew York Court of Chancery · 1818
  5. Wilson v. Matthews, Finley & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1858

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API