Legal Opinion

Reed v. Key-Chrysler Plymouth

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 23, 1998No. 97-CA-44PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brogan, Judge.

Defendant-appellant, Key-Chrysler Plymouth (“Key-Chrysler”), appeals from a judgment of the Xenia Municipal Court, Small Claims Division, awarding plaintiffs-appellees, Samuel A. and Jana Reed, $526.35 plus interest. Key-Chrysler contends that the judgment of the small claims court should be reversed as against the manifest weight of ■ the evidence. Because we find that the judgment below was supported by the weight of the evidence, we affirm.

Appellees have not filed a brief of reply with this court. Consequently, under App.R. 18(C), we may accept as correct the statement of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Ross v. RossOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Reilley v. RichardsOhio Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Gevedon v. IveyOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Abood v. NemerOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. State v. Tillery, Unpublished Decision (4-4-2002)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API