Legal Opinion
Pomeranz v. McDonald's Corp.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided January 6, 1992No. 89CA2086PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge JONES.
Defendant, McDonald’s Corporation, appeals from a judgment entered by the trial court holding that it improperly terminated its lease with plaintiffs, the co-owners of the subject premises. Plaintiffs cross-appeal the portion of the trial court’s judgment reducing plaintiffs’ award by the present value of the reasonable rental value of the premises. We affirm the portion of the judgment holding that McDonald’s improperly terminated the lease but reverse as to the amount of damages awarded.
Plaintiffs own a shopping center in Grand Junction, Colorado. On January 16, 1963,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Tull v. Gundersons, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Good v. AB Chance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1977
- Schneiker v. GordonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Fitzgerald v. EdelenColorado Court of Appeals · 1980
- John v. United Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stahl v. Sun Microsystems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Pomeranz v. McDonald's Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- 64 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 468, 64 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,013, 9 indiv.empl.rts.cas. (Bna) 456 Stephanie L. Stahl, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Sun Microsystems, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994