Legal Opinion

Citibank N.A. v. Rowe

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 2013No. 12CA010217PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Citibank N.A. v. Rowe,

2013-Ohio-523.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA) NA C.A. No. 12CA010217 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE HARLEY E. ROWE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF LORAIN, OHIO Appellant CASE No. 11CV171804 DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY Dated: February 19, 2013 WHITMORE, Judge. {¶1} Defendant-Appellant, Harley Rowe, appeals from a judgment of the Lorain County Court of Common Pleas, granting Appellee, Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.’s (“Citibank SD”), motion for summary judgment. This…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. SchwartzwaldOhio Supreme Court · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., L.L.C. v. VanLeeuwenOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Citibank, N.A. v. HineOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Matrix Acquisitions, L.L.C. v. ManleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API