Legal Opinion
Restighini v. Hanagan
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 30, 1939PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.
These are three bills in equity under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 175, § 113, and c. 214, § 3 (10), to enforce the liability of the defendant company under a policy issued by it pursuant to the compulsory motor vehicle insurance law. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 90, §§ 34A-34J. The plaintiffs had recovered judgments against Hanagan for personal injuries sustained by them by reason of his negligent operation of an automobile owned by one O'Connell. The trial judge made a voluntary finding of facts in each case which included the following: “I find as a fact that Timothy O’Connell did not grant express…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Birnbaum v. PamoukisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- City of Boston v. DolanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Cleaveland v. Malden Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Graustein v. DolanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Plumer v. Houghton & Dutton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Liquor Liability Joint Underwriting Ass'n v. Hermitage InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Carilli v. HerseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Lynn v. NashawatyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
- Sarnafil, Inc. v. Peerless Insurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Gleason v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.