Legal Opinion

People v. Roberson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 16, 1977No. 75-284PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Seidenfeld

The State appeals from an order which suppressed evidence and statements.

The State first contends that a search of the defendant’s car including the locked trunk (where yam was found which became the basis of a theft charge against the defendant) was lawful and that therefore the motion to suppress evidence should have been denied.

At the combined hearing on defendant’s motions Officer Larry Myroth of the Rochelle Police Department testified that on November 21,1974, at about 12:20 a.m. he arrived at the Del Monte plant in response to a call from the plant security guard. He stated that the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Cardwell v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. WallsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. People v. FullerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. People v. McCueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. People v. ColleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. People v. ElkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API