Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Ogan v. Ellison

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 24, 1983No. 132318; A25964Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partVan Hoomissen, J.

This is an action for breach of contract and fraud. In 1976, plaintiffs bought parcel A from defendants. In 1978, plaintiffs bought contiguous parcel B from defendants. Plaintiffs allege that defendants impliedly represented that the two parcels were legally partitioned, when in fact they were not. They allege further that the value of the parcels is less because they are not legally partitioned.

Viewing the record in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, I would hold that there are genuine issues of material fact that should have been submitted to the trier of fact. Whether a contract…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hodecker v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API