Legal Opinion

Hodecker v. Butler

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 3, 1983No. 30360; A26371PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment for defendants. We reverse in part and affirm in part.

Plaintiffs first claim alleged that she signed an earnest money agreement with defendant Butler and his wife, that Butler promised to pay plaintiff $5,000 as earnest money and gave her a note for the earnest money, that the sale of the house was to close on or before April 1,1981, that the title of the property was marketable, but that Butler refused to close, and that the earnest money of $5,000 should be forfeited to plaintiff.

As a third claim plaintiff alleged that the earnest money was in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Uihlein v. Albertson's, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Meskimen v. Larry Angell Salvage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Millikin v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Loewen v. GalliganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. United States National Bank v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. Ogan v. EllisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Peterson v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API