Legal Opinion

State v. Minn

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1995No. 17803PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAMIL, Justice.

Defendant-appellant Albert Allen Minn (Defendant) was charged with second degree theft. During its deliberations, the jury requested a transcript of Honolulu Police Officer Richard Wheeler’s testimony because it was “split on whether value [of the items allegedly stolen] ha[d] been established beyond a reasonable doubt.” After additional requests for the transcript were denied by the trial court, the jury communicated that it was deadlocked on the issue of value and that no further deliberations would be helpful. The trial court then declared a mistrial over the objection of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. People v. PierceIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. MoriwakeHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. EstradaHawaii Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. PokiniHawaii Supreme Court · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. QuitogHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. HailiHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. BaxleyHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. State v. JohnsonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API