Legal Opinion

Bikman v. New York City Loft Board

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 2010No. 45PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jones, J.

The question before this Court is whether the estate of a deceased loft tenant is entitled to recoup the value of improvements made by the tenant pursuant to Multiple Dwelling Law § 286 (6). We answer in the affirmative.

Decedent Minda Bikman became a resident of the subject Manhattan loft in 1974 and was the protected tenant under article 7-C of the Multiple Dwelling Law. 1 Minda died in 1997 and petitioner Charla Bikman, Minda’s sister, represents the estate. During her tenancy, Minda improved the raw loft space by installing a kitchen and bathroom and making…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. KSLM-Columbus Apartments, Inc. v. New York State Division of HousingNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Moskowitz v. JordenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. 577 Broadway Real Estate Partners v. GiacintoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Committee for Taxi Safety, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Matter of Bikman v. New York City Loft Bd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  3. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. WrynnNew York Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API