Legal Opinion

Committee for Taxi Safety, Inc. v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 2013PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Peter H. Moulton, J.

In this CPLR article 78 proceeding petitioners seek a declaration that respondents have exceeded their powers, violated law, and acted arbitrarily and capriciously by adopting rules establishing the Nissan NV200 as the “Taxi of Tomorrow” and entering into a 10-year, exclusive manufacturing and supply contract with a subsidiary of Nissan North America, Inc.

Background

The Taxi of Tomorrow program was initiated by respondent Taxi & Limousine Commission (the TLC) in 2007 to consider options to improve taxicabs in New York City. As a result of a lengthy…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Church of St. Paul & St. Andrew v. BarwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Fossella v. DinkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Bittrolff v. Ho's Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Mayfield v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Bikman v. New York City Loft BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 2010

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Greater New York Taxi Ass'n v. New York City Taxi and Limousine CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Greater New York Taxi Ass'n v. New York City Taxi & Limousine CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Greater New York Taxi Ass'n v. New York City Taxi & Limousine CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. Greater New York Taxi Ass'n v. New York City Taxi & Limousine CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. The Matter of Viking Pump Inc. and Warren Pumps, LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API