Committee for Taxi Safety, Inc. v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Peter H. Moulton, J.
In this CPLR article 78 proceeding petitioners seek a declaration that respondents have exceeded their powers, violated law, and acted arbitrarily and capriciously by adopting rules establishing the Nissan NV200 as the “Taxi of Tomorrow” and entering into a 10-year, exclusive manufacturing and supply contract with a subsidiary of Nissan North America, Inc.
Background
The Taxi of Tomorrow program was initiated by respondent Taxi & Limousine Commission (the TLC) in 2007 to consider options to improve taxicabs in New York City. As a result of a lengthy…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Church of St. Paul & St. Andrew v. BarwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Fossella v. DinkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Bittrolff v. Ho's Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Mayfield v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Bikman v. New York City Loft BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
3Cited by5 opinions
- Greater New York Taxi Ass'n v. New York City Taxi and Limousine CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
- Greater New York Taxi Ass'n v. New York City Taxi & Limousine CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 2013
- Greater New York Taxi Ass'n v. New York City Taxi & Limousine CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Greater New York Taxi Ass'n v. New York City Taxi & Limousine CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- The Matter of Viking Pump Inc. and Warren Pumps, LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2015