Legal Opinion

Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. Little

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1897No. 18,124PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From the Pike Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

In the lower court the appellee recovered a judgment for damages alleged to have arisen from the appellant’s negligent killing of John F. Little. The complaint was in four paragraphs, but the cause was submitted to a jury upon the,second paragraph *168only. It would, therefore, be improper to consider the sufficiency of other paragraphs. Robinson v. Dickey, 143 Ind. 205; Marvin v. Sager, 145 Ind. 261. The second paragraph of complaint alleged that Little was a locomotive engineer, in the employ of the appellant, in charge of a locomotive hauling a fast train eastward over the appellant’s road;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robinson v. DickeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Marvin v. SagerIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Railway Co. v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  4. Harley v. Louisville & N. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Tennessee · 1893

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Indianapolis & Greenfield Rapid Transit Co. v. ForemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Indianapolis Union Railway Co. v. HoulihanIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. American Rolling Mill Co. v. HullingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1903

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API