In re Haas
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1985. He resides in Colorado.
By decisions in 1997 and 2004, respondent was suspended from practice by this Court (Matter of Haas, 3 AD3d 732 [2004]; Matter of Haas, 239 AD2d 658 [1997]). He now applies for reinstatement; two prior applications were denied (Matter of Haas, 11 AD3d 877 [2004]; Matter of Haas, 308 AD2d 656 [2003]). Consonant with petitioner’s recommendation and this Court’s rules, we referred the application to the Committee on Character and Fitness (see 22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]). Three members of the Committee interviewed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re HaasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re HaasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by1 opinion
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HaasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010