Legal Opinion
United States v. Stacy Harden, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 14, 2014No. 13-1323PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TINDER, Circuit Judge.
Pursuant to a written plea agreement, Stacy Lee Harden pled guilty to possession with the intent to distribute cocaine. With Harden’s consent, the district court instructed a magistrate judge to conduct a Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 plea colloquy under a local rule allowing for magistrate judges to accept felony guilty pleas. The magistrate judge accepted Harden’s guilty plea, and the district court then conducted a sentencing hearing and imposed sentence. Harden now appeals the magistrate judge’s acceptance of his guilty plea, arguing that the magistrate…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Gomez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Pablo Bastidas v. Kevin ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Christopher McCoy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Valerie FloresCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Solano v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. FinnesyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.