Legal Opinion
Union Natl. Bank v. Hickey
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided March 23, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Error .to the district court for Douglas county. Tried below before Doane, J. cited: Schlueter v. Raymond, 7 Neb., 282; Hollingsworth v. Fitzgerald, 16 Id., 495; Wilson v. Burney, 8 Id., 45; Clarh v. Fox-worthy, 14 Id., 242. cited : Schlueter v. Raymond, 7 Neb., 282; Wilson v. Burney, 8 Id., 42; Hollingsworth v. Fitzgerald, 16 Id., 492.
1Opinion of the Court
Maxwell, Ch. J.
In October, 1888, the defendant in error instituted proceedings in aid of execution against George D. Edson. Summons in garnishment was served on the plaintiff in error, which appeared and answered, whereupon the court made an order as follows:
“Michael Hickey v. George D. Edson.} Order of Garnishment.
“And now, on the 24th day of April, 1888, it appearing from the answer and .amended answer of the Union National Bank, by J. W. Rodefer, its cashier, garnishee in the above entitled cause, that said bank had on the 15th *301day of March, 1888, personal property, to-wit, money in the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hollingsworth v. FitzgeraldNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by1 opinion
- Johnson v. SamuelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1908