Legal Opinion

Marone v. Delfino

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Decided July 8, 1942No. File No. 32954Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum of decision in action based on claimed breach of warranty.

MOLLOY, J.

This action is based upon a claimed breach of warranty. There seems to be no question but that the plaintiff was injured on April 3, 1941. On that day, about 3:00 p.m., she purchased onedialf of a pineapple pie from the defendants Anthony Delfino and Domenico Fanelli, doing business in the City of New Haven as the Bari Cash Grocery. About 8:45 p.m., while eating a piece of the pie in her home, a small piece of metal, apparently hidden in the fruit part of the pie, cut her right upper gum and became imbedded in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Burkhardt v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  2. Wall v. ToomeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1884
  3. Truslow Fulle, Inc. v. Diamond Bottling CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  4. Sapiente v. WaltuchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  5. Donaghue v. GaffySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API