Legal Opinion
(SS) Badillo v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, E.D. California
Decided June 29, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00393Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CECILIO BADILLO, Case No. 1:20-cv-00393-SAB 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DENYING 13 v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN MATTER TO 15 Defendant. DISTRICT JUDGE 16 (ECF Nos. 2, 4, 6, 9) 17 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS 18 19 Currently before the Court is Cecilio Badillo’s fourth application to proceed in this action 20 without prepayment of fees, filed on June 22, 2020. For…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Maria Escobedo v. Apple American GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. William F. McQuade and Wilma N. McQuadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.