Legal Opinion

Emcasco Insurance Co. v. Dover

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 1983No. 82CA0403PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STERNBERG, Judge.

The defendants, Margaret and Zane Dover, were insured under an automobile liability policy issued by the plaintiff, Emcas-co Insurance Company. In a declaratory judgment action filed by the insurer, the trial court held it was not obligated to defend the Dovers, and was not liable for any damages that might be awarded against the Dovers to a third party in an action arising out of a motor vehicle accident. On appeal by defendants, we reverse.

The liability insurance policy provided that “if claim is made or suit is brought against the insured, he shall immediately forward to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marez v. Dairyland Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. Certified Indemnity Company v. ThunSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  3. Rowe v. Watered Down FarmsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  4. Barnes v. Waco Scaffolding and Equip. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Wilson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Clementi v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. Hansen v. BarmoreColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Leadville Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  4. Leadville Corporation v. United States Fidelity And Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. State Personnel Board v. LloydSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API