State Personnel Board v. Lloyd
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Dissent · QuinnQuinn, Chief Justice
I join Part II of Justice Mullarkey’s dissent. Although I believe that the notice requirements of the Governmental Immunity Act apply to a civil action arising out of the so-called Whistleblower Act, Justice Mullarkey’s dissent convinces me that Doctor Lloyd substantially complied with the notice provisions of the Governmental Immunity Act under the rather peculiar circumstances of this case. I would remand the case to the court of appeals with directions to return the case to the district court for trial.
2Dissent · MullarkeyMullarkey, Justice
I respectfully dissent because I find no evidence that the legislature intended to…
3Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Procunier v. NavaretteSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pulliam v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dayton Board of Education v. BrinkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.