Legal Opinion

State Personnel Board v. Lloyd

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 7, 1988No. 85SC400Published

1Dissent · QuinnQuinn, Chief Justice

I join Part II of Justice Mullarkey’s dissent. Although I believe that the notice requirements of the Governmental Immunity Act apply to a civil action arising out of the so-called Whistleblower Act, Justice Mullarkey’s dissent convinces me that Doctor Lloyd substantially complied with the notice provisions of the Governmental Immunity Act under the rather peculiar circumstances of this case. I would remand the case to the court of appeals with directions to return the case to the district court for trial.

2Dissent · MullarkeyMullarkey, Justice

I respectfully dissent because I find no evidence that the legislature intended to…

3Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Procunier v. NavaretteSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Pulliam v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Dayton Board of Education v. BrinkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API