Legal Opinion · Dissent

Riner v. Flanders

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1931No. 8092Published

1Dissent

Beck, P. J., and Gilbert, J.,

dissenting. The Civil Code (1910), § 5458, provides, in part: “The writ [of prohibition] . . is the counterpart of mandamus, to arrest illegal proceedings by any court officer where no other legal remedy or relief is given; *47and the granting or refusal thereof is governed by the same principles of right, necessity, and justice.” In City of Macon v. Anderson, 155 Ga. 607 (2) (supra), this court ruled: “The "writ of prohibition is an available remedy only where no other legal remedy or relief is given; and where a complete remedy exists by appeal, writ of error, writ…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Macon v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  2. Hudson v. PrestonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Ginn v. LinnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  4. Heaton v. HooperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  5. Beckham v. HowardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API