Legal Opinion
In Re Estate of Messenger, 5-08-07 (10-6-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 6, 2008No. 5-08-07PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} The defendant-appellant, Casey Messenger, appeals the judgment of the Hancock County Common Pleas Court, Probate Division, denying his motion to set aside judgment. On appeal, Appellant contends the trial court erred by failing to consider his exceptions to the inventory, by denying his Civ. R. 60(B) motion, and by failing to offset his one-third interest in the estate from the amount due to the estate. For the reasons set forth herein, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
{¶ 2} On November 3, 2006, the plaintiffs-appellees, Rebecca Bigler and Christina Courtad, filed a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harris v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Key v. MitchellOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Durkin v. UngaroOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Eger v. EgerOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
- Bolles v. Toledo Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v. CottonOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- In re Estate of DistelhorstOhio Court of Appeals · 2016