Commonwealth v. Kinner
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, P. J.,
The main contention of the appellant in this case is squarely ruled against him by our decision in Com. v. Orris, 136 Pa. Superior Ct. 137, 7 A. 2d 88, where we held, in an opinion by Judge Cunningham, in which he fully discussed the subject, that a defendant indicted in a single count drawn under section 91 of the Penal Code of 1860, P. L. 382, as amended by Act of May 19, 1887, P. L. 128, for “statutory rape”, may be convicted under section 50 of the Criminal Procedure Act of March 31, 1860, P. L. 427, of an attempt to commit that felony.
The other assignments of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Garland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Williams v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
- Commonwealth v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Commonwealth v. OrrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. SyrenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Commonwealth v. CrandallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Commonwealth v. LelandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Balles v. HarveyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.