Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ortlip v. du Pont

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided October 20, 1944No. 157PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Speakman, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

Section 189 of the Code of 1935, as above quoted, originated as the result of two Acts of the General Assembly amending Chapter 68 of the Revised Code of 1852, entitled “Concerning retailers of goods and peddlers.” The chapter at the time of the adoption of the respective amendments dealt exclusively with the licensing of retailers of goods and peddlers.

The respective amendments were passed on February 25, 1859 and March 8, 1861, and are published as Chapter 646 of Volume 11, and Chapter 123 of Volume 12 of our Laws. The amendments without any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nigro v. FlinnSuperior Court of Delaware · 1937
  2. Trader v. JesterSuperior Court of Delaware · 1938
  3. Lasseter v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  4. Atlantic Refining Co. v. Penn Seaboard Steel Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State of Oregon v. BuckOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. State of Oregon v. BuckOregon Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API