Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Schlottman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1964PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused when defendant’s and plaintiff’s automobiles collided. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered on a verdict for defendant.

Defendant’s automobile struck the rear end of plaintiff’s automobile which caused the two cars to “lock” together. Plaintiff testified that when he got out of his car he felt a pain in his back and that when he leaned over to see how the two cars were engaged he felt a severe pain “like I was struck in the back.”

In his examination of witnesses and in his argument to the jury…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Levine v. BarryWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Holmberg v. JacobsOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Duggins v. International Motor Transit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. McCauley v. Pacific Atlantic Steamship Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barretto v. AkauHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Streight v. ConroyOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. StringerOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Samuel v. VanderheidenOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Keeland v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API