Keeland v. Yamhill County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.
Plaintiff, while confined with 10 or 12 other men in a dormitory cell in the Yamhill County jail, was injured when one of the inmates threw a razor blade at him. His negligence action against the defendant resulted in a plaintiff’s verdict. The defendant’s assignments of error on appeal present five questions: (1) Was the county immune from tort liability? (2) Assuming tort liability, was there any evidence of negligence? (3) Was a witness offered as an expert qualified as such? (4) Did a hypothetical question put to the expert witness constitute prejudicial error because of a misstatement of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith v. CooperOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Valdin v. HolteenOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- Godvig v. LopezOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Denny v. WarrenOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- WILSON ET UX. v. KruseOregon Supreme Court · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992
- Christensen v. EpleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Jones v. Chehalem Park & Recreation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Salazar v. Collins, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
- Wright v. Scappoose School District No. IJCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.