Legal Opinion

Keeland v. Yamhill County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 19, 1976No. 29690, CA 4388PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

Plaintiff, while confined with 10 or 12 other men in a dormitory cell in the Yamhill County jail, was injured when one of the inmates threw a razor blade at him. His negligence action against the defendant resulted in a plaintiff’s verdict. The defendant’s assignments of error on appeal present five questions: (1) Was the county immune from tort liability? (2) Assuming tort liability, was there any evidence of negligence? (3) Was a witness offered as an expert qualified as such? (4) Did a hypothetical question put to the expert witness constitute prejudicial error because of a misstatement of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. CooperOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Valdin v. HolteenOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Godvig v. LopezOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Denny v. WarrenOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. WILSON ET UX. v. KruseOregon Supreme Court · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992
  2. Christensen v. EpleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. Jones v. Chehalem Park & Recreation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. Salazar v. Collins, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  5. Wright v. Scappoose School District No. IJCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API