Legal Opinion

Stokes v. Muschinske

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided March 14, 2019No. B280116PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBigelow, P. J.

*47Plaintiffs James Stokes and his wife Patricia Stokes sued Defendant Martin Muschinske after he rear-ended a car driven by Stokes, injuring him. Muschinske stipulated to liability for the accident, and the remaining issues, particularly the extent of Stokes's injuries and damages, were tried to a jury. After hearing testimony from numerous experts and other witnesses, the jury returned a damages award of just over $ 610,000, far below Stokes's requested damages of $ 23.5 million for himself and $ 4 million for his wife.

Stokes1 seeks to overturn the award, arguing the jury foreperson…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. San NicolasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Howell v. HAMILTON MEATS & PROVISIONS, INC.California Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Hernandez v. California Hospital Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Corenbaum v. LampkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Ovando v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Audish v. MaciasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  2. Bodozian v. Total Holdings USA CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API