Stokes v. Muschinske
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtBigelow, P. J.
*47Plaintiffs James Stokes and his wife Patricia Stokes sued Defendant Martin Muschinske after he rear-ended a car driven by Stokes, injuring him. Muschinske stipulated to liability for the accident, and the remaining issues, particularly the extent of Stokes's injuries and damages, were tried to a jury. After hearing testimony from numerous experts and other witnesses, the jury returned a damages award of just over $ 610,000, far below Stokes's requested damages of $ 23.5 million for himself and $ 4 million for his wife.
Stokes1 seeks to overturn the award, arguing the jury foreperson…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. San NicolasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Howell v. HAMILTON MEATS & PROVISIONS, INC.California Supreme Court · 2011
- Hernandez v. California Hospital Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Corenbaum v. LampkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Ovando v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Audish v. MaciasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- Bodozian v. Total Holdings USA CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2021