Legal Opinion

People v. Hines

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 18, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

At the conclusion of a hearing pursuant to People v Hinton (31 NY2d 71, cert denied 410 US 911), the defendant objected to closure of the courtroom to the general public and also requested that a Legal Aid attorney who had been observing the trial be allowed to remain in the courtroom during the undercover officer’s testimony. The Supreme Court ruled that the courtroom would be sealed to the public based on concerns over the safety of the officer and also ruled that unless the defense wished to make the Legal Aid attorney cocounsel, he would also be excluded.

On appeal, the defendant contends…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. HintonNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. People v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. People v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. People v. KanNew York Court of Appeals · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. K.U.New York Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People v. WatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API