Legal Opinion
Hawk v. Wil-Mar, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 18, 1956No. [No. 199, October Term, 1955.]PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.
From a judgment for the defendant, entered when the plaintiff closed in a personal injury case, the plaintiff appeals, assigning as error the directing of the verdict and refusal to compel production before trial of the statement of a witness.
In July, 1951, appellant Pauline Hawk, then fifteen years old, and another girl went to Tolchester. After lunch they patronized the amusements, including the roller coaster. Then, the day being hot and sunny, they went to the beach where they stayed until about seven o’clock. After supper the two girls went on the roller coaster with two boys they had…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Benedick v. PottsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
- Best Park & Amusement Co. v. RollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Adams v. BensonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Martin v. Capital Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Baltimore Transit Co. v. MezzanottiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Stein v. Overlook Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Velte v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- William F. Klingensmith, Inc. v. David H. Snell Landscape Contractor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Beach v. Woodward & Lothrop, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.