Bradley v. Johnson

This appeal is from a judgment in favor of-appellee for $50 damages on account of the negligent killing of a “pot-licker hound.”

Appellants have made 36 assignments of error, and by a blanket statement in brief have undertaken to render it necessary that each of them should be treated by this court as having been argued and insisted upon. But we will not.

If briefs would be prepared in strict accordance with the rules, it would greatly simplify the labors of the appellate courts. But we seem to have fallen heir to a sort of loose or liberal practice in that regard, and will, as best we can…