Legal Opinion

Tennard v. Dretke

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 1, 2006No. 00-20915PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner Robert James Tennard appeals the district court’s denial of his habe-as corpus petition. Because the Texas courts were objectively unreasonable under applicable Supreme Court Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment jurisprudence in concluding that Tennard’s jury had an adequate vehicle during the capital sentencing phase to give mitigating effect to relevant evidence of a low intelligence quotient (“IQ”), we reverse the district court’s decision and remand with instructions to grant habeas relief.

I

A

The facts of Tennard’s heinous crime and the subsequent state…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chambers v. QuartermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  2. Nelson v. QuartermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  3. Brown v. City of AlexandriaDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2022
  4. Ex Parte HoodCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  5. Ex Parte HoodCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API