Ex Parte Hood
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Dissent
COCHRAN, J.,
dissenting, in which WOMACK, JOHNSON, and HOLCOMB, JJ., joined.
I respectfully dissent.
We filed and set this subsequent application for a writ of habeas corpus in a death penalty case to decide, among other things, whether applicant could have raised his “nullification instruction” claim in his earlier habeas applications. I conclude that no Texas or federal court had recognized the legal basis for his claim until the Supreme *781Court decided Tennard v. Dretke.1 Therefore applicant’s legal claim is newly available, and we should address the merits of his jury-charge claim under…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.