Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex Parte Hood

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 10, 2007No. AP-75370Published

1Dissent

COCHRAN, J.,

dissenting, in which WOMACK, JOHNSON, and HOLCOMB, JJ., joined.

I respectfully dissent.

We filed and set this subsequent application for a writ of habeas corpus in a death penalty case to decide, among other things, whether applicant could have raised his “nullification instruction” claim in his earlier habeas applications. I conclude that no Texas or federal court had recognized the legal basis for his claim until the Supreme *781Court decided Tennard v. Dretke.1 Therefore applicant’s legal claim is newly available, and we should address the merits of his jury-charge claim under…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API