Legal Opinion
Hoover-Bond Co. v. Denman
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 27, 1932No. 5881PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKS, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, herein called plaintiff, brought suit against the administrator of the estate of Nauts, a deceased revenue collector, to recover the sum of $13,108.87 with interest which it alleged was wrongfully exacted from it as ineomo and profits taxes for the year 1917,
*910Plaintiff has been engaged since 1913 in the sale of furniture at retail. The principal portion of its sales was on the installment plan. The amount sued for represents an additional assessment for the year 1917 made on May 25, 1925, and paid by plaintiff upon the same date. No statute of limitations is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hellmich v. HellmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Tennessee v. WhitworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Willcuts v. GradwohlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Tull & Gibbs, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- John M. Brant Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- John Wanamaker v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
- Jackson Furniture Co. v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Rubert Armstrong v. Tribunal de Contribuciones de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1952
- City Stores Company v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- Rubert Armstrong v. Tax Court of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1952