Legal Opinion

State v. Bullock

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 2007No. COA04-665-2PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Judge.

This case comes before us on remand from the North Carolina Supreme Court in order that we may reexamine the issue of sentencing in light of its recent decision in State v. Blackwell, 361 N.C. 41, 638 S.E.2d 452 (2006), cert. denied, - S. Ct. -, -L. Ed. 2d-(2007). The Court in Blackwell held that according to Washington v. Recuenco, 126 S. Ct. 2546, 165 L. Ed. 2d 466 (2006), the failure to submit a sentencing factor to the jury is subject to harmless error review. Blackwell, 361 N.C. at 44, 638 S.E.2d at 455. We now review the issue of whether the error in defendant’s…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. State v. BlackwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. VeazeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. State v. RicoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. State v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. State v. BullockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  5. State v. VeazeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API