State v. Bullock
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Chief Judge.
This case comes before us on remand from the North Carolina Supreme Court in order that we may reexamine the issue of sentencing in light of its recent decision in State v. Blackwell, 361 N.C. 41, 638 S.E.2d 452 (2006), cert. denied, - S. Ct. -, -L. Ed. 2d-(2007). The Court in Blackwell held that according to Washington v. Recuenco, 126 S. Ct. 2546, 165 L. Ed. 2d 466 (2006), the failure to submit a sentencing factor to the jury is subject to harmless error review. Blackwell, 361 N.C. at 44, 638 S.E.2d at 455. We now review the issue of whether the error in defendant’s…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. BlackwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. VeazeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. RicoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. BullockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. VeazeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008