United States v. Sebring
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KEATING, Senior Judge:
This ease is before us for review under Article 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice [UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. § 866, and as a petition for a new trial filed pursuant to Article 73, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 873, based on newly-discovered evidence concerning quality control problems at the Navy Drug Screening Laboratory, Norfolk, Virginia. At oral argument, we specified the issue of whether the Government violated appellant’s due process rights under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), when it failed to disclose evidence favorable to the defense. We…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. WilliamsArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
- United States v. SchlarbNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997