Legal Opinion

Colonial Insurance v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 27, 1943No. Civ. No. 14065PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, Acting P. J.

In this proceeding to annul an award of the Industrial Accident Commission to an injured employee, the question for decision is correctly stated by counsel for respondent as follows: “Does a monetary payment by the employer (who was reimbursed by his insurance carrier) to an injured employee, to be used to pay for the services of a chiropractor who had treated, and temporarily relieved, the pain in the employee’s sprained back, give the Industrial *11Accident Commission continuing jurisdiction so that an application for compensation for new and further disability may be filed by the employee at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Union Iron Works v. Industrial Accident CommisionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Henry Cowell Lime & Cement Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Morrison v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Beverly v. Fairmont HotelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Colonial Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Colonial Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Spieker v. Skelly Oil CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Spieker v. Skelly Oil CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API