Legal Opinion

Beverly v. Fairmont Hotel

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 26, 1927No. Docket No. 5864PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Petitioner brought this proceeding in certiorari to have annulled an award made by the Industrial Accident Commission denying his application for compensation upon the ground that the same was barred by the provisions of section 11 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1917 (Stats. 1917, p. 841).

The record discloses the following facts: Petitioner on February 8, 1921, while employed as a stationary engineer at the Fairmont Hotel in San Francisco, sustained an injury to his back by falling from a tank. The State Compensation Insurance Fund was at that time the insurance carrier for said hotel…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Colonial Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API