Legal Opinion

United States v. Ohio Barge Lines, Inc., in Personam and M/v Steel Forwarder, Her Engines Tackle, Appurtenances, Etc., in Rem v. John Doe, Richard Roe, Abc Inc. And Xyz Co., in Personam and the Vessels, Tackle and Appurtenances, Jane Doe and Mary Roe, in Rem, Third-Party

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 21, 1986No. 85-3155Published

1Opinion of the Court

796 F.2d 685

UNITED STATES of America

v.

OHIO BARGE LINES, INC., in personam and M/V STEEL FORWARDER,

her engines tackle, appurtenances, etc., in rem, Appellants,

v.

John DOE, Richard Roe, ABC Inc. and XYZ Co., in personam and

the Vessels, Tackle and Appurtenances, Jane Doe

and Mary Roe, in rem, Third-Party Defendants.

No. 85-3155.

United States Court of Appeals,

Third Circuit.

Argued Feb. 18, 1986.

Decided July 21, 1986.

1

Wayne J. Emery, Richard J. Munsch (Argued), Rafael Caminero, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellants.

2

J. Alan Johnson, U.S. Atty., Constance M. Bowden (Argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Pittsburgh,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wyandotte Transportation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. China Union Lines, Ltd., Mitsubishi International Corporation, Lan Jing-Chau, Armement Deppe, S.A. v. A. O. Andersen & Co., American Cyanamid CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  3. Complaint of the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. Ohio Barge Line, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. United States v. Ohio Barge Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API