Legal Opinion
Matthew D’Annunzio v. S.G. Preston Company
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 16, 2026No. 2:23-cv-04533Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MATTHEW D’ANNUNZIO, : CIVIL ACTION : Plaintiff, : : v. : : NO. 23-4533 S.G. PRESTON COMPANY, : : Defendant. : Perez, J. September 16, 2026 MEMORANDUM For years, Plaintiff Matthew D’Annunzio provided legal services to his client S.G. Preston Company (“SGP”) without being paid. He devoted his own time to SGP’s matters, assigned other attorneys at his law firm to assist, and advocated for the representation to continue as the unpaid bills mounted. By the end, his law firm was owed more than a million dollars, and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- American Eagle Outfitters v. Lyle & Scott Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Lackner v. GlosserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.