Legal Opinion

Parekh v. United Parcel Service

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided December 9, 1994No. 94-6330PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFremont-Smith, J.

The plaintiff has appealed the approval of two special permits by the Planning Board for the Town of Chelmsford, whereby Mascester Co., Inc. and United Parcel Service (“UPS”) were permitted to increase the area of the parking lot on an eighty-three-acre parcel of land, where UPS operates a major tractor terminal. UPS’s single-story building houses eight hundred separate conveyer belts for the transportation of UPS’s packages throughout the building to and from tractor trailer loading bays at the facility. At present, the facility employs about 1700 people working four shifts, resulting in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Andover Liquors, Inc. v. Den Rock Liquors, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API