Legal Opinion
Rose v. Elliott
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided February 13, 1976No. Civ-2-75-151PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NEESE, District Judge.
The plaintiff applied to the Court for a default judgment against the defendant herein. Rule 55(b)(2), Federal Rules of Civil. Procedure. It would be necessary in order to carry such a judgment into effect to determine the amount of any debt of the defendant to the plaintiff and to establish the truth of certain of the plaintiff’s averments. Idem. However, it appears from the complaint that the Court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter of this action.
The only ostensible basis of jurisdiction of the subject matter of this action in this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. Dealers Transit, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1965
- Carignan v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1969
- Dodrill v. New York Central Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1966
- Farris v. YoungbloodDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1965
- Overton v. Rainbo Baking Co. of Johnson City, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Singer Co. v. Greever & Walsh Wholesale Textile, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1977
- Curtis Higgins v. The American Bottling CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
- Muhtaseb v. AlzayatDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022