Smith v. Paiz
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Constance and Donald Smith filed a negligence action against Danielle J. Paiz (Paiz) seeking to recover damages arising out of an automobile accident. Prior to trial, the district court issued an order limiting the testimony of Connie Smith’s (Smith) treating physicians to factual matters only because Smith had failed to timely designate them as expert witnesses. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm.
ISSUES
[¶ 2] Smith frames the issue on appeal as follows:
Was reversible error committed when the trial court prohibited the treating healthcare providers of Connie…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Martin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Byerly v. MadsenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- Perry v. SeraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Schreiber v. Estate of KiserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pete v. YoungbloodCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006
- William C. Forbes and Julia Forbes, Trustees of the Beckton Ranch Trust U/A/D April 1, 1920Wyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Jared Eaton Dutka v. Emily Rene-Elizabeth DutkaWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
- Fetzer v. J.D. Dayley & Sons, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Kirkwood v. StateNebraska Court of Appeals · 2008