Roskam Baking Co. v. Lanham MacHinery Co.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
Defendants, Lanham Machinery Company, Inc., APV Consolidated, Inc., and APV Baker Company, Inc. (collectively “APV” or “Defendants”), filed a motion seeking dismissal or summary judgment based on, among other things, a statute of limitations/statute of repose, M.C.L. § 600.5839(1). In a January 24, 2000, Memorandum Opinion and Order, this Court held that APV waived its statute of limitations/statute of repose defense by not raising the defense in a timely manner. In that Opinion and Order, this Court did not reach the issue of whether § 600.5839(1) was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- In Re: Seymour Markowitz, Debtor. Seymour Markowitz v. Carolyn CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Sanders Confectionery Products, Inc. v. Heller Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Rosenberg v. Town of North BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- Kenneth M. Romstadt v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clark County School District v. Richardson Construction, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2007
- Spectrum Health Continuing Care Group v. Anna Marie Bowling Irrevocable TrustDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2004