Legal Opinion

Roskam Baking Co. v. Lanham MacHinery Co.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided April 18, 2000No. 1:97-cv-00213PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

QUIST, District Judge.

Defendants, Lanham Machinery Company, Inc., APV Consolidated, Inc., and APV Baker Company, Inc. (collectively “APV” or “Defendants”), filed a motion seeking dismissal or summary judgment based on, among other things, a statute of limitations/statute of repose, M.C.L. § 600.5839(1). In a January 24, 2000, Memorandum Opinion and Order, this Court held that APV waived its statute of limitations/statute of repose defense by not raising the defense in a timely manner. In that Opinion and Order, this Court did not reach the issue of whether § 600.5839(1) was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. In Re: Seymour Markowitz, Debtor. Seymour Markowitz v. Carolyn CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. Sanders Confectionery Products, Inc. v. Heller Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  4. Rosenberg v. Town of North BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  5. Kenneth M. Romstadt v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clark County School District v. Richardson Construction, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Spectrum Health Continuing Care Group v. Anna Marie Bowling Irrevocable TrustDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API