Legal Opinion

Quirk v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 6, 1915No. 1579PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7735 (T. D. 35499).

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

Paragraph 128 of the tariff act of 1913 provides for—

penknives, pocketknives, clasp knives, pruning knives, budding knives, erasers, manicure knives, and all knives by whatever name known, including such as are denominatively mentioned in this section, which have folding or other than fixed blades or attachments * * * whether assembled but not fully finished or finished—

at ad valorem rates of duty based upon their value by the dozen.

Paragraph 391 of the same act', in the free list, is as follows:

391. Agricultural implements: Plows, tooth and disk harrows, headers, harvesters, reapers,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Powers v. BarneyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1863

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  2. United States v. Ducommun Hardware Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  3. Brown v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  4. Voss Cutlery Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API