Legal Opinion

State v. Larson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 17, 2015No. 71238-1-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 — Zachary Larson attempted to steal a pair of shoes from a retail store. The shoes were equipped with a security device that was attached to the shoes by wire. Yet, Larson, using wire cutters that he had brought into the store, severed the wire and removed the security device. When Larson tried to leave the store, he was stopped by security employees and, subsequently, was charged with one count of retail theft with extenuating circumstances, which criminalizes the commission of retail theft while in *906possession of a “device designed to overcome security systems.” Former RCW 9A.56.360(l)(b)…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. LarsonWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. LarsonWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. LarsonWashington Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API