Legal Opinion
Saper v. Sussman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided June 26, 1945PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Per Curiam.
Under the rules and regulations of the Treasury Department, the bond in question could not be transferred by way of gift, sale or pledge (Code of Fed. Beg., Cum. Supp., tit. 31, § 315.8). The bond, therefore, remained the property of the bankrupt and was subject to replevy by.the trustee in bankruptcy.
The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion granted.
Hammer, Shientag and Eder, JJ., concur.
Order reversed, etc.
2Cited by9 opinions
- Moore's Adm'r v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
- Brown v. VinsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
- In Re BartlettDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1947
- Hatfield v. BuckNew York Supreme Court · 1948
- Ab Intestato de NakdimenSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.