Legal Opinion

Hatfield v. Buck

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1948PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHearn, J.

Plaintiff moves herein for summary judgment pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice.

The action is brought to secure a judgment declaring plaintiff the owner and entitled to the immediate possession of certain United States savings bonds of total face value of $3,650. The complaint alleges further that the bonds are registered in plaintiff’s name as sole owner, that they were delivered for safekeeping to plaintiff’s son, Charles H. Hatfield, and that defendant is in possession of the bonds and wrongfully refuses to give them up.

The answers admits defendant’s possession, but denies…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. . SpohrNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. In Re BartlettDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1947
  3. Saper v. SussmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1945
  4. In re the Estate of BakosNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ab Intestato de NakdimenSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  2. Land v. Gladol Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Merker v. MerkerNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Ab intestato of Boris NakdimenSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API