Legal Opinion

Protest Upon Worker's Compensation Claim of Carson v. Wyoming State Penitentiary

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1987No. 86-76PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

URBIGKIT, Justice.

Can the trial court, in awarding Worker’s Compensation benefits for an inmate injured at a confinement institution, offset benefits paid against maintenance costs at the institution?

This issue is here following the trial court’s denial of a Rule 60(b), W.R.C.P. motion, which we now reverse.1

FACTS

Claimant Gary Carson, while incarcerated at the Wyoming State Penitentiary, claimed that a back injury occurred in December, 1984, while shoveling snow at the institution. A Worker’s Compensation claim followed, answered by a penitentiary protest that Carson’s injury resulted from…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Feaster v. FeasterWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Nuspl v. NusplWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  4. McBride v. McBrideWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Kennedy v. KennedyWyoming Supreme Court · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of the Worker's Compensation Claim of: Lana M. Tegeler v. State of Wyoming, ex rel., Workers' Safety and Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API